Sneaky upskirt photos

Description:On the surface, the statute seems not only reasonable, but also obvious, especially when one considers the unsavory details of the case that spawned the ruling. Improper photography, upskirt shots which is actually different from this Texas case , and revenge porn all fall into legal grey zones in many states, despite ample examples of sinister cases that warrant legal punishment. In an attempt to protect citizens from unwanted and inappropriate sexualization, Texas passed a law that hinges on determining whether someone took photos with the intention of providing themselves with sexual pleasure regardless of how physically invasive the photos are or the photographer is in taken them. Two days after the ruling, Gov. As states increasingly attempt to pass revenge porn legislation and launch suits against revenge porn sites, First Amendment concerns have reared their ugly, constitutional head. Yet, with almost complete unanimity only one of the nine judges dissented , the highest criminal court in Texas struck down the section of the improper photography law that forbids taking photographs in non-bathroom and non-dressing room spaces essentially public spaces under the following conditions: Police subsequently discovered 73 photos of children in bathing suits focusing on their breasts and buttocks.

Views: 8475 Date: 2018-09-02 Favorited: 59